As the boxing world anticipates Gervonta ‘Tank’ Davis’s next bout, scheduled for December 14th in Houston against Lamont Roach Jr., excitement mingles with skepticism. This match, held under the PBC banner and available on Prime Video PPV for a hefty price of $75.95, raises questions about the card’s allure beyond just Davis. While Davis is undeniable in his marketability, fans are already voicing concerns about whether Roach, promoted from the super featherweight division, can hold their attention or warrant such an expenditure.
Savvy boxing fans know that pay-per-view events often hinge on the strength of their undercards. The previous bout featuring Davis against Frank Martin was significantly enhanced by the presence of David Benavidez taking on Oleksandr Gvozdy, making the event not just a showcase of talent but a night filled with compelling matchups. As of now, the undercard for the December fight is still up in the air. Without a strong supporting fight, there is a looming danger that this PPV may underperform, leading to a lackluster response in Houston, a city where Davis has built a solid fan base.
Rumors have floated about possible matches involving WBC interim light heavyweight champion Benavidez, but without official confirmation, fans remain uncertain. His promoter Sampson Lewkowicz has provided little insight on the fighter’s next steps, only adding to the growing anxiety.
One of the more intriguing aspects of this matchup is why Davis’s team opted for Roach instead of the more formidable #3 ranked contender, Edwin De Los Santos. This decision has led to speculation about Davis’s strategy. Is he angling for a more straightforward defense, knowing Roach may bring less risk than De Los Santos? Selecting an opponent with a reputation for finesse over power could suggest a desire to secure a more comfortable victory, allowing Davis to maintain his champion status without the threat of a knockdown.
This calculated risk raises ethical discussions in boxing regarding the responsibility of champions to face worthy challengers. The WBA’s recent decision to grant Roach special permission to temporarily freeze his super featherweight title for this clash adds another layer of complexity. If Roach succeeds, he will face a critical decision: maintain his lightweight title or return to defend his super featherweight crown.
The intricacies of this matchup reveal a risk-averse mentality in championship boxing today, often prioritizing marketability over a robust competitive spirit.
As the date draws closer, boxing enthusiasts are left pondering the implications of the Davis vs. Roach fight. While Davis is undoubtedly a draw, the crux of the issue remains whether he can attract the kind of audience necessary to justify this PPV price in light of the opponent selection and the currently uncertain undercard. If boxing is to thrive, champions must challenge themselves against formidable opponents willing to vie for their titles. The upcoming fight will not only test Davis’s prowess in the ring but also gauge the loyalty of his fans who are demanding quality as much as they are entertainment.